OK they weren't that specific, but most of the professionals at the conference were in agreement: absolutely no signing! It made me so sad! Angelina absolutely LOVES Baby Signing Time! Its the only thing that she watches on TV (good thing). And to watch her sign is not only the cutest thing but also so helpful. She knows about 15 words in sign language.
See how much she loves it? (make sure you turn down music down below-- sorry about laughing!)
Let me start off by saying that I am so grateful for and blessed that there are people like Dr. Shprintzen, Karen Golding-Kushner, Dr. Ysunza and so many others that are so dedicated to the
VCFS Education Foundation. They dedicate their careers to our children- where would we be with out them? They work so hard to learn more about and teach others about VCFS. I mean VCFS is one of the most common genetic disorders.....yet how many people have heard of it? How many of us hadn't heard of it until our own child/ family member was diagnosed with it? So for their help and dedication I have utmost respect and gratefulness.
Having said that, I'll have to admit I was flabbergasted at how adamant they were about not teaching our kids sign language. When Dr. Shprintzen specifically said NO SIGN LANGUAGE to me I was sad, but said OK! I mean he's been doing this for a long time right? And Lord knows the last thing I want to do is delay, or interfere in Angelina's speech and language development.
As I sat thought the conference it kept bugging me. They wanted me to from now on ignore her signing and only use spoken language. I felt like, "How can I do that to Angelina, isn't that kind of mean?" Then I heard what other parents had to say and realized how many parents were using it. So now I had heard both sides and realized I could argue for both- great! Now what?
They say no because: it gives kids easy way out of talking, especially if others can't understand them; also they feel why waste time and energy on teaching ASL, when you can spend that time just focusing on speech and language therapy. Basically, they are saying "it does not improve speech production nor does it make them more receptive to speech therapy."
Why yes: start communicating with kids sooner, and for those moments when you've tried really hard and still can't understand them. Some VCFS kids have speech delays, so what if cognitively they can't speak until they are 2? I personally think that by learning sign language they are having to use their brains, they are learning- isn't that good? For more benefits check out the
Signing Time website.So Alex (hubby) and I talked and discussed issue. For now we will continue with sign language. Why stop the communication that we already started? At least we are ahead of the game by knowing what problems might arise in the future. We will resume speech therapy and do as much as we can at home!
Eat and Drink songSee her telling brother she wants water to drink?What do you all think?